CAT 2018 Slot 1 — VARC Question 1
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
. . . “Everybody pretty much agrees that the relationship between elephants and people has dramatically changed,” [says psychologist Gay] Bradshaw. . . . “Where for centuries humans and elephants lived in relatively peaceful coexistence, there is now hostility and violence. Now, I use the term ‘violence’ because of the intentionality associated with it, both in the aggression of humans and, at times, the recently observed behavior of elephants.” . .
Typically, elephant researchers have cited, as a cause of aggression, the high levels of testosterone in newly matured male elephants or the competition for land and resources between elephants and humans. But. . . Bradshaw and several colleagues argue. . . that today’s elephant populations are suffering from a form of chronic stress, a kind of species wide trauma. Decades of poaching and culling and habitat loss, they claim, have so disrupted the intricate web of familial and societal relations by which young elephants have traditionally been raised in the wild, and by which established elephant herds are governed, that what we are now witnessing is nothing less than a precipitous collapse of elephant culture. . . .
Elephants, when left to their own devices, are profoundly social creatures. . . . Young elephants are raised within an extended, multitier network of doting female caregivers that includes the birth mother, grandmothers, aunts and friends. These relations are maintained over a life span as long as 70 years. Studies of established herds have shown that young elephants stay within 15 feet of their mothers for nearly all of their first eight years of life, after which young females are socialized into the matriarchal network, while young males go off for a time into an all-male social group before coming back into the fold as mature adults. . . .
This fabric of elephant society, Bradshaw and her colleagues [demonstrate], ha[s] effectively been frayed by years of habitat loss and poaching, along with systematic culling by government agencies to control elephant numbers and translocations of herds to different habitats. . . . As a result of such social upheaval, calves are now being born to and raised by ever younger and inexperienced mothers. Young orphaned elephants, meanwhile, that have witnessed the death of a parent at the hands of poachers are coming of age in the absence of the support system that defines traditional elephant life. “The loss of elephant elders,” [says] Bradshaw . . . "and the traumatic experience of witnessing the massacres of their family, impairs normal brain and behavior development in young elephants.”
What Bradshaw and her colleagues describe would seem to be an extreme form of anthropocentric conjecture if the evidence that they’ve compiled from various elephant researchers. . . weren’t so compelling. The elephants of decimated herds, especially orphans who’ve watched the death of their parents and elders from poaching and culling, exhibit behavior typically associated with post traumatic stress disorder and other trauma related disorders in humans: abnormal startle response, unpredictable asocial behavior, inattentive mothering and hyper aggression. . . .
[According to Bradshaw], “Elephants are suffering and behaving in the same ways that we recognize in ourselves as a result of violence. . . . Except perhaps for a few specific features, brain organization and early development of elephants and humans are extremely similar.”
Which of the following statements best expresses the overall argument of this passage?
Answer & solution
- A
Elephants, like the humans they are in conflict with, are profoundly social creatures.
- B
The relationship between elephants and humans has changed from one of coexistence to one of hostility.
Recent elephant behavior could be understood as a form of species-wide trauma related response.
- D
The brain organisation and early development of elephants and humans are extremely similar.
Easy
This is a main-idea question. The right answer must cover the whole passage, not just one paragraph. The passage repeatedly returns to Bradshaw's central thesis: decades of poaching, culling and habitat loss have traumatised elephant society, so today's elephant behaviour is best read as a species-wide, trauma-induced response. Reject options that capture only a single detail.
Elephants, like the humans they are in conflict with, are profoundly social creatures. True of paragraph 3, but this is a supporting detail used to set up the trauma argument, not the overall argument. The passage is not chiefly about how social elephants are. Too narrow — reject.
The relationship between elephants and humans has changed from coexistence to hostility. This is only the opening observation (paragraph 1). The rest of the passage explains why behaviour changed (trauma), so this captures the starting point, not the argument as a whole. Reject.
Recent elephant behavior could be understood as a form of species-wide trauma related response. This is exactly Bradshaw's thesis (“a kind of species wide trauma”, paragraph 2) and it threads through the entire passage — collapse of elephant culture, frayed social fabric, and PTSD-like behaviour in decimated herds. It covers the whole argument. Correct.
The brain organisation and early development of elephants and humans are extremely similar. This appears only in the final sentence as a closing analogy. It is a single detail, not the overall point. Reject.
Answer: Option C. It alone states Bradshaw's central, passage-wide claim — that today's elephant behaviour is a species-wide trauma response — while A, B and D each capture only one localized detail.