CAT 2018 Slot 2VARC Question 10

Mixed PracticeEasy
Passage / Data

Answer the following question based on the information given below.

NOT everything looks lovelier the longer and closer its inspection. But Saturn does. It is gorgeous through Earthly telescopes. However, the 13 years of close observation provided by Cassini, an American spacecraft, showed the planet, its moons and its remarkable rings off better and better, revealing finer structures, striking novelties and greater drama. . . .

By and large the big things in the solar system—planets and moons—are thought of as having been around since the beginning. The suggestion that rings and moons are new is, though, made even more interesting by the fact that one of those moons, Enceladus, is widely considered the most promising site in the solar system on which to look for alien life. If Enceladus is both young and bears life, that life must have come into being quickly. This is also believed to have been the case on Earth. Were it true on Enceladus, that would encourage the idea that life evolves easily when conditions are right.

One reason for thinking Saturn’s rings are young is that they are bright. The solar system is suffused with comet dust, and comet dust is dark. Leaving Saturn’s ring system (which Cassini has shown to be more than 90% water ice) out in such a mist is like leaving laundry hanging on a line downwind from a smokestack: it will get dirty. The lighter the rings are, the faster this will happen, for the less mass they contain, the less celestial pollution they can absorb before they start to discolour. . . . Jeff Cuzzi, a scientist at America’s space agency, NASA, who helped run Cassini, told the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston that combining the mass estimates with Cassini’s measurements of the density of comet-dust near Saturn suggests the rings are no older than the first dinosaurs, nor younger than the last of them—that is, they are somewhere between 200m and 70m years old.

That timing fits well with a theory put forward in 2016, by Matija Cuk of the SETI Institute, in California and his colleagues. They suggest that at around the same time as the rings came into being an old set of moons orbiting Saturn destroyed themselves, and from their remains emerged not only the rings but also the planet’s current suite of inner moons— Rhea, Dione, Tethys, Enceladus and Mimas. . . .

Dr Cuk and his colleagues used computer simulations of Saturn’s moons’ orbits as a sort of time machine. Looking at the rate at which tidal friction is causing these orbits to lengthen they extrapolated backwards to find out what those orbits would have looked like in the past. They discovered that about 100m years ago the orbits of two of them, Tethys and Dione, would have interacted in a way that left the planes in which they orbit markedly tilted. But their orbits are untilted. The obvious, if unsettling, conclusion was that this interaction never happened—and thus that at the time when it should have happened, Dione and Tethys were simply not there. They must have come into being later. . . .

Data provided by Cassini challenged the assumption that:

 

Answer & solution

  • all big things in the solar system have been around since the beginning.

  • B

    new celestial bodies can form from the destruction of old celestial bodies.

  • C

    Saturn’s ring system is composed mostly of water ice.

  • D

    there was life on earth when Saturn’s rings were being formed.

Solution

The first sentence of the second paragraph states that big things in the solar system were assumed to be present since the beginning. However, Cassini’s observations negated this assumption. Retain option 1.
Option 2 is incorrect as the fourth paragraph talks about Saturn’s old moons destroying themselves which led to the emergence of the rings and the planets’ new moons. However, option 2 generalizes the statement to celestial bodies. Thus it can be negated.
Though option 3 is true as per the third sentence of the third paragraph, it does not challenge any assumption. Negate it.
Though option 4 is true as per the last sentence of the third paragraph, it is not challenging any assumption but putting forth a new theory. Thus it can be negated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.

CAT 2018 Slot 2 VARC Q10: Data provided by Cassini challenged the assumption that: — Solution | TheCATExam