CAT 2017 Slot 1 — VARC Question 10
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
I used a smartphone GPS to find my way through the cobblestoned maze of Geneva’s Old Town, in search of a handmade machine that changed the world more than any other invention. Near a 13th-century cathedral in this swiss city on the shores of a lovely lake, I found what looking for: a Gutenberg printing press. “This was the Internet of its day – at least as influential as the iPhone, “said Gabriel de Montmollin, the director of the Museum of the Reformation, toying with the replica of Johann Gutenberg’s great invention.
[Before the invention of the printing press] it used to take four monks… up to a year to produce a single book. With the advance in movable type in 15th-century Europe, one press could crank out 3,000 pages a day. Before long, average people could travel to places that used to be unknown to them – with maps! Medical information passed more freely and quickly, diminishing the sway of quacks… The printing press offered the prospect that tyrants would never be able to kill a book or suppress an idea. Gutenberg’s brainchild broke the monopoly that clerics had on scripture. And later, stirred by pamphlets from a version of that same press, the American colonies rose up against a king and gave birth to a nation.
So, a question in the summer of this 10th anniversary of the iPhone: has the device that is perhaps the most revolutionary of all time given us a single magnificent idea? Nearly every advancement of the written word through new technology has also advanced humankind. Sure, you can say the iPhone changed everything. By putting the world’s recorded knowledge in the palm of a hand, it revolutionized work, dining, travel and socializing. It made us more narcissistic – here’s more of me doing cool stuff! – and it unleashed an army of awful trolls. We no longer have the patience to sit through a baseball game without that reach to the pocket. And one more casualty of Apple selling more than a billon phones in a decade’s time: daydreaming has become a lost art.
For all of that, I’m still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy… the Geneva museum makes a strong case that the printing press opened more minds than anything else… it’s hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print…
Not long after Steve Jobs introduced his iPhone, he said the bound book was probably headed for history’s attic. Not so fast. After a period of rapid growth in e-books, something closer to the medium for Chaucer’s volumes has made a great comeback.
The hope of the iPhone, and the Internet in general, was that it would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out… The iPhone is still young. It has certainly been “one of the most important, world-changing and successful products in history,” as Apple C.E.O. Tim cook said. But I’m not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone – as it did with the printing press – or merely changed.
“I’m still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy.” The author uses which one of the following to indicate his uncertainty?
Answer & solution
Correct answer: The continued suppression of free speech in closed societies.
- A
The rise of religious groups in many parts of the world.
- B
The expansion in trolling and narcissism among users of the Internet.
The continued suppression of free speech in closed societies.
- D
The decline in reading habits among those who use the divice.
Easy
The author wonders whether the iPhone can do for “religion and democracy” what the printing press did — i.e., free minds and free societies. Find the evidence he cites for his doubt. It appears in the final paragraph, where the iPhone’s political promise is shown to have failed.
The rise of religious groups around the world. — Incorrect. The passage never mentions any rise of religious groups. “Religion” appears only as one of the two domains (with democracy) the printing press transformed, not as evidence of present-day doubt.
Expansion of trolling and narcissism. — Incorrect. Trolls and narcissism are listed (paragraph 3) as social side-effects of the iPhone, not as reasons the author doubts its impact on religion and democracy. They support a different point.
Continued suppression of free speech in closed societies. — Correct. The last paragraph states the hope was that the iPhone “would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out.” This is precisely the evidence behind his uncertainty about its effect on democracy and freedom.
Decline in reading habits among device users. — Incorrect. The passage does not claim iPhone users read less; this is not raised at all and is unrelated to the religion-and-democracy comparison.
Option C. His uncertainty rests on the iPhone’s failure to free closed societies — the Arab Spring’s failure and continued suppression in North Korea, China and Iran.
Related Mixed Practice questions
- Which of the following best describe what the passage is trying to do?…
- Early maps did NOT put north at the top for all the following reasons EXCEPT…
- According to the passage, early Chinese maps placed north at the top because…
- It can be inferred from the passage that European explorers like Columbus and Me…
- Which one of the following about the northern orientation of modern maps is asse…
- The role of natural phenomena in influencing map-making conventions is seen most…