CAT 2017 Slot 1 — VARC Question 11
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
I used a smartphone GPS to find my way through the cobblestoned maze of Geneva’s Old Town, in search of a handmade machine that changed the world more than any other invention. Near a 13th-century cathedral in this swiss city on the shores of a lovely lake, I found what looking for: a Gutenberg printing press. “This was the Internet of its day – at least as influential as the iPhone, “said Gabriel de Montmollin, the director of the Museum of the Reformation, toying with the replica of Johann Gutenberg’s great invention.
[Before the invention of the printing press] it used to take four monks… up to a year to produce a single book. With the advance in movable type in 15th-century Europe, one press could crank out 3,000 pages a day. Before long, average people could travel to places that used to be unknown to them – with maps! Medical information passed more freely and quickly, diminishing the sway of quacks… The printing press offered the prospect that tyrants would never be able to kill a book or suppress an idea. Gutenberg’s brainchild broke the monopoly that clerics had on scripture. And later, stirred by pamphlets from a version of that same press, the American colonies rose up against a king and gave birth to a nation.
So, a question in the summer of this 10th anniversary of the iPhone: has the device that is perhaps the most revolutionary of all time given us a single magnificent idea? Nearly every advancement of the written word through new technology has also advanced humankind. Sure, you can say the iPhone changed everything. By putting the world’s recorded knowledge in the palm of a hand, it revolutionized work, dining, travel and socializing. It made us more narcissistic – here’s more of me doing cool stuff! – and it unleashed an army of awful trolls. We no longer have the patience to sit through a baseball game without that reach to the pocket. And one more casualty of Apple selling more than a billon phones in a decade’s time: daydreaming has become a lost art.
For all of that, I’m still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy… the Geneva museum makes a strong case that the printing press opened more minds than anything else… it’s hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print…
Not long after Steve Jobs introduced his iPhone, he said the bound book was probably headed for history’s attic. Not so fast. After a period of rapid growth in e-books, something closer to the medium for Chaucer’s volumes has made a great comeback.
The hope of the iPhone, and the Internet in general, was that it would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out… The iPhone is still young. It has certainly been “one of the most important, world-changing and successful products in history,” as Apple C.E.O. Tim cook said. But I’m not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone – as it did with the printing press – or merely changed.
The author attributed the French and American revolutions to invention of the printing press because
Answer & solution
Correct answer: the rapid spread of information exposed people to new ideas on freedom and democracy.
- A
maps enabled large numbers of Europeans to travel and settle in the American continent.
the rapid spread of information exposed people to new ideas on freedom and democracy.
- C
it encouraged religious freedom among the people by destroying the monopoly of religious leaders on the scriptures
- D
it made available revolutionary strategies and opinions to the people.
Easy
Locate the exact reasoning the author gives for tying the revolutions to the press. Paragraph 4 supplies it: the press “opened more minds than anything else… it’s hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print.” The right option must capture ideas spreading and opening minds, not an incidental capability of the press.
Maps let Europeans travel and settle in America. — Incorrect. Maps are mentioned (paragraph 2) as one benefit of cheap printing, but travel and settlement are not what the author credits for the revolutions. It is true but irrelevant to the question asked.
Rapid spread of information exposed people to new ideas on freedom and democracy. — Correct. This matches “the printing press opened more minds than anything else… hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print.” The press multiplied output (“3,000 pages a day”) and circulated enlightened ideas — exactly “the rapid spread of information… new ideas on freedom and democracy.”
It broke the clerics’ monopoly on scripture. — Incorrect. Breaking the clerical monopoly is cited as a religious effect; the author does not label that a revolution. The question asks specifically about the French and American revolutions, which he ties to enlightened ideas in print, not to scripture.
It made revolutionary strategies and opinions available. — Incorrect. This confuses the medium with specific content. The author credits the broad opening of minds through enlightened voices, not the dissemination of particular “revolutionary strategies.”
Option B. The press spread information rapidly and exposed people to new ideas of freedom and democracy — the “enlightened voices in print” the author says made the revolutions imaginable.
Related Mixed Practice questions
- Which of the following best describe what the passage is trying to do?…
- Early maps did NOT put north at the top for all the following reasons EXCEPT…
- According to the passage, early Chinese maps placed north at the top because…
- It can be inferred from the passage that European explorers like Columbus and Me…
- Which one of the following about the northern orientation of modern maps is asse…
- The role of natural phenomena in influencing map-making conventions is seen most…