CAT 2017 Slot 1 — VARC Question 11
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
I used a smartphone GPS to find my way through the cobblestoned maze of Geneva’s Old Town, in search of a handmade machine that changed the world more than any other invention. Near a 13th-century cathedral in this swiss city on the shores of a lovely lake, I found what looking for: a Gutenberg printing press. “This was the Internet of its day – at least as influential as the iPhone, “said Gabriel de Montmollin, the director of the Museum of the Reformation, toying with the replica of Johann Gutenberg’s great invention.
[Before the invention of the printing press] it used to take four monks… up to a year to produce a single book. With the advance in movable type in 15th-century Europe, one press could crank out 3,000 pages a day. Before long, average people could travel to places that used to be unknown to them – with maps! Medical information passed more freely and quickly, diminishing the sway of quacks… The printing press offered the prospect that tyrants would never be able to kill a book or suppress an idea. Gutenberg’s brainchild broke the monopoly that clerics had on scripture. And later, stirred by pamphlets from a version of that same press, the American colonies rose up against a king and gave birth to a nation.
So, a question in the summer of this 10th anniversary of the iPhone: has the device that is perhaps the most revolutionary of all time given us a single magnificent idea? Nearly every advancement of the written word through new technology has also advanced humankind. Sure, you can say the iPhone changed everything. By putting the world’s recorded knowledge in the palm of a hand, it revolutionized work, dining, travel and socializing. It made us more narcissistic – here’s more of me doing cool stuff! – and it unleashed an army of awful trolls. We no longer have the patience to sit through a baseball game without that reach to the pocket. And one more casualty of Apple selling more than a billon phones in a decade’s time: daydreaming has become a lost art.
For all of that, I’m still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy… the Geneva museum makes a strong case that the printing press opened more minds than anything else… it’s hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print…
Not long after Steve Jobs introduced his iPhone, he said the bound book was probably headed for history’s attic. Not so fast. After a period of rapid growth in e-books, something closer to the medium for Chaucer’s volumes has made a great comeback.
The hope of the iPhone, and the Internet in general, was that it would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out… The iPhone is still young. It has certainly been “one of the most important, world-changing and successful products in history,” as Apple C.E.O. Tim cook said. But I’m not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone – as it did with the printing press – or merely changed.
The author attributed the French and American revolutions to invention of the printing press because
Answer & solution
- A
maps enabled large numbers of Europeans to travel and settle in the American continent.
the rapid spread of information exposed people to new ideas on freedom and democracy.
- C
it encouraged religious freedom among the people by destroying the monopoly of religious leaders on the scriptures
- D
it made available revolutionary strategies and opinions to the people.
Option 1 is incorrect. Though factually correct, the ability to travel and settle in the American continent did not lead to a revolution. In other words, it does not answer the question. Eliminate option 1. Option 2 is correct. Paragraph 4 states: “… I am still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy… the Geneva museum makes a strong case that the printing press opened more minds than anything else… it’s hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print….” Retain option 2.
Option 3 is incorrect. While it is true that the printing press ‘broke the monopoly that the clerics had on scripture, and later stirred the American colonies to rise up against a king and establish a nation”, the writer does not term it as a revolution. The question is about how the French and American revolutions are related to the invention of the printing press. Eliminate option 3.
Option 4 is incorrect. Though option 4 looks plausible, the printing press did not directly make revolutionary strategies and opinions to the people. The medium should not be confused with the content – hence we can eliminate option 4.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.