CAT 2017 Slot 1VARC Question 12

Mixed PracticeEasy
Passage / Data

Answer the following question based on the information given below.

I used a smartphone GPS to find my way through the cobblestoned maze of Geneva’s Old Town, in search of a handmade machine that changed the world more than any other invention. Near a 13th-century cathedral in this swiss city on the shores of a lovely lake, I found what looking for: a Gutenberg printing press. “This was the Internet of its day – at least as influential as the iPhone, “said Gabriel de Montmollin, the director of the Museum of the Reformation, toying with the replica of Johann Gutenberg’s great invention.

[Before the invention of the printing press] it used to take four monks… up to a year to produce a single book. With the advance in movable type in 15th-century Europe, one press could crank out 3,000 pages a day. Before long, average people could travel to places that used to be unknown to them – with maps! Medical information passed more freely and quickly, diminishing the sway of quacks… The printing press offered the prospect that tyrants would never be able to kill a book or suppress an idea. Gutenberg’s brainchild broke the monopoly that clerics had on scripture. And later, stirred by pamphlets from a version of that same press, the American colonies rose up against a king and gave birth to a nation.

So, a question in the summer of this 10th anniversary of the iPhone: has the device that is perhaps the most revolutionary of all time given us a single magnificent idea? Nearly every advancement of the written word through new technology has also advanced humankind. Sure, you can say the iPhone changed everything. By putting the world’s recorded knowledge in the palm of a hand, it revolutionized work, dining, travel and socializing. It made us more narcissistic – here’s more of me doing cool stuff! – and it unleashed an army of awful trolls. We no longer have the patience to sit through a baseball game without that reach to the pocket. And one more casualty of Apple selling more than a billon phones in a decade’s time: daydreaming has become a lost art.

For all of that, I’m still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy… the Geneva museum makes a strong case that the printing press opened more minds than anything else… it’s hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print…

Not long after Steve Jobs introduced his iPhone, he said the bound book was probably headed for history’s attic. Not so fast. After a period of rapid growth in e-books, something closer to the medium for Chaucer’s volumes has made a great comeback.

The hope of the iPhone, and the Internet in general, was that it would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out… The iPhone is still young. It has certainly been “one of the most important, world-changing and successful products in history,” as Apple C.E.O. Tim cook said. But I’m not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone – as it did with the printing press – or merely changed.

The main conclusion of the passage is that the new technology has

Answer & solution

Correct answer: so far not proved as successful as the printing press in opening people’s minds.

  • A

    some advantages, but these are outweighed by its disadvantages.

  • so far not proved as successful as the printing press in opening people’s minds.

  • C

    been disappointing because it has changed society too rapidly.

  • D

    been more wasteful than the printing press because people spend more time daydreaming or surfing.

Solution

Easy

Identify the author’s overall verdict, not a passing detail. The whole essay measures the iPhone against the printing press and closes undecided: “I’m not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone — as it did with the printing press — or merely changed.” The conclusion is comparative and tentative.

A

Advantages outweighed by disadvantages. — Incorrect. The author lists both pros and cons but never concludes the cons win; he remains explicitly unsure (“or merely changed”). This overstates a negative verdict he refuses to give.

B

So far not proved as successful as the printing press in opening people’s minds. — Correct. The throughline is the comparison with the press, which “opened more minds than anything else,” while the author is “still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did.” The iPhone has not (yet) matched that mind-opening impact — precisely this option.

C

Disappointing because it changed society too rapidly. — Incorrect. The author does not call the iPhone disappointing, nor blame “too rapid” change. His point is uncertainty about whether the change was for the better, not a complaint about speed.

D

More wasteful than the press because of daydreaming/surfing. — Incorrect. Lost daydreaming is one minor side-effect mentioned in passing, not the main conclusion. It cannot stand for the essay’s central comparative judgement.

Option B. The passage concludes that the new technology has so far not proved as successful as the printing press in opening people’s minds.

Related Mixed Practice questions

See all Reading Comprehension questions →
CAT 2017 Slot 1 VARC Q12: The main conclusion of the passage is that the new technology has — Solution | TheCATExam