CAT 2017 Slot 1VARC Question 15

Mixed PracticeEasy
Passage / Data

Answer the following question based on the information given below.

This year alone, more than 8,600 stores could close, according to industry estimates, many of them the brand-name anchor outlets that real estate developers once stumbled over themselves to court. Already there have been 5,300 retail closings this year… Sears Holdings—which owns Kmart—said in March that there’s “substantial doubt” it can stay in business altogether, and will close 300 stores this year, So far this year, nine national retail chains have filed for bankruptcy.

Local jobs are major casualty of what analysts are calling, with only a hint of hyperbole, the retail apocalypse. Since 2002, department stores have lost 448,000 jobs, a 25% decline, while the number of store closures this year is on pace to surpass the worst depths of the Great Recession. The growth of online retailers, meanwhile, has failed to offset those losses, with the e-commerce sector adding just 178,000 jobs over the past 15 years. Some of those jobs can be found in massive distribution centers Amazon has opened across the country, often not too far from malls the company helped shutter.

But those are workplaces, not gathering places. The mall is both. And in the 61 years since the first enclosed one opened in suburban Minneapolis, the shopping mall has been where a huge swath of middle-class America went for far more than shopping. It was the home of first jobs and blind dates, the place for family photos and ear piercings, where goths and grandmothers could somehow walk through the same doors and find something they all liked. Sure, the food was lousy for you and the oceans of parking lots encouraged car-heavy development, something now scorned by contemporary planners. But for better or worse, the mall has been America’s public square for the last 60 years.

So what happens when it disappears?

Think of your mall. Or think of the one you went to as a kid. Think of the perfume clouds in the department stores. The fountains splashing below the skylights. The cinnamon wafting from the food court. As far back as ancient Greece, societies have congregated around a central marketplace. In medieval Europe, they were outside cathedrals. For half of the 20th century and almost 20 years into the new one, much of America has found their agora on the terrazzo between Orange Julius and Sbarro, Waldenbooks and the Gap, Sunglass Hut and Hot Topic.

That mall was an ecosystem unto itself, a combination of community and commercialism peddling everything you needed and everything you didn’t: Magic eye posters, wind catchers, air Jordans. …A growing number of Americans, however, don’t see the need to go to nay Macy’s at all. Our digital lives are frictionless and ruthlessly efficient, with retail and romance available at a click. Malls were designed for leisure, abundance, ambling. You parked and planned to spend some time. Today, much of that time has been given over to busier lives and second jobs and apps that let you swipe right instead of haunt the food court. Malls, say Haryard business professor Leonard Schlesinger, “were built for patterns of social interaction that increasingly don’t exist.”

In paragraph 1, the phrase “real estate developers once stumbled over themselves to courts” suggests that they

Answer & solution

Correct answer: no longer pursue brand-name anchor outlets.

  • A

    took brand-name anchor outlets to court.

  • no longer pursue brand-name anchor outlets.

  • C

    collaborated with one another to get brand-name anchor outlets.

  • D

    were eager to get brand-name anchor outlets to set up shop in their mall.

Solution

Easy

Two clues fix the phrase. First, “court” here means to woo/pursue, and “stumbled over themselves” means did so eagerly. Second, the word “once” signals a past state contrasted with the present. The full sentence says these anchor outlets are now closing — so today developers no longer chase them. The question asks what the phrase suggests, given that contrast.

A

Took brand-name outlets to court. — Incorrect. This reads “court” as a lawsuit. Here “to court” is the verb meaning to woo/seek favour, so a legal reading misinterprets the idiom.

B

No longer pursue brand-name anchor outlets. — Correct. The word “once” plus the news that 8,600 such anchor stores could close implies the eager pursuit is now over: with the outlets shutting down, developers no longer chase them. This is the implication the phrase “suggests.”

C

Collaborated with one another. — Incorrect. “Stumbled over themselves” conveys competitive eagerness, not cooperation among developers. Nothing suggests collaboration.

D

Were eager to get outlets to set up shop. — Incorrect (literal, not what it suggests). This is the literal meaning of the phrase in the past, but the question asks what it suggests given “once.” The implication is the contrast with the present — that they no longer pursue them — which D fails to capture.

Option B. Because these anchor outlets are now closing en masse, the phrase — with its “once” — suggests developers no longer pursue them.

Related Mixed Practice questions

See all Reading Comprehension questions →
CAT 2017 Slot 1 VARC Q15: In paragraph 1, the phrase “real estate developers once stumbled over themselves to courts” sugges — Solution | TheCATExam