CAT 2018 Slot 1VARC Question 15

Mixed PracticeEasy
Passage / Data

Based  on the information given below, answer the questions which follow.

The only thing worse than being lied to is not knowing you’re being lied to. It’s true that plastic pollution is a huge problem, of planetary proportions. And it’s true we could all do more to reduce our plastic footprint. The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is waste ful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it. Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper. You struggle to find a place to do it and feel pleased when you succeed. But your effort is wholly inadequate and distracts from the real problem of why the building is collapsing in the first place. The real problem is that single-use plastic—the very idea of producing plastic items like grocery bags, which we use for an average of 12 minutes but can persist in the environment for half a millennium—is an incredibly reckless abuse of technology. Encouraging individuals to recycle more will never solve the problem of a massive production of single-use plastic that should have been avoided in the first place.

As an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, I have had a disturbing window into the accumulating literature on the hazards of plastic pollution. Scientists have long recognized that plastics biodegrade slowly, if at all, and pose multiple threats to wildlife through entanglement and consumption. More recent reports highlight dangers posed by absorption of toxic chemicals in the water and by plastic odors that mimic some species’ natural food. Plastics also accumulate up the food chain, and studies now show that we are likely ingesting it ourselves in seafood. . . .

Beginning in the 1950s, big beverage companies like Coca-Cola and Anheuser-Busch, along with Phillip Morris and others, formed a non-profit called Keep America Beautiful. Its mission is/was to educate and encourage environmental stewardship in the public. . . . At face value, these efforts seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the role that corporate polluters play in the plastic problem. This clever misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep America Beautiful as the first corporate green washing front, as it has helped shift the public focus to consumer recycling behavior and actively thwarted legislation that would increase extended producer responsibility for waste management. . . . [T]he greatest success of Keep America Beautiful has been to shift the onus of environmental responsibility onto the public while simultaneously becoming a trusted name in the environmental movement. . . .

So what can we do to make responsible use of plastic a reality? First: reject the lie. Litterbugs are not responsible for the global ecological disaster of plastic. Humans can only function to the best of their abilities, given time, mental bandwidth and systemic constraints. Our huge problem with plastic is the result of a permissive legal framework that has allowed the uncontrolled rise of plastic pollution, despite clear evidence of the harm it causes to local communities and the world’s oceans. Recycling is also too hard in most parts of the U.S. and lacks the proper incentives to make it work well.

It can be inferred that the author considers the Keep America Beautiful organisation:

Answer & solution

Correct answer: a sham as it diverted attention away from the role of corporates in plastics pollution.

  • A

    a "greenwash" because it was a benevolent attempt to improve public recycling habits.

  • a sham as it diverted attention away from the role of corporates in plastics pollution.

  • C

    an important step in sensitising producers to the need to tackle plastics pollution.

  • D

    an innovative example of a collaborative corporate social responsibility initiative

Solution

Easy

Find the author's evaluation of Keep America Beautiful in paragraph 3. He describes it as a "greenwashing front" that shifted blame onto the public and away from corporate polluters. The correct option must capture that critical, deceptive characterisation.

A

A greenwash because it was a benevolent attempt to improve recycling. The author calls it greenwashing precisely because it was NOT benevolent; "benevolent" only describes its face value. The reasoning here is contradictory. Incorrect.

B

A sham that diverted attention from the role of corporates. Paragraph 3: it is "the first corporate greenwashing front," shifting public focus to consumer recycling and thwarting producer-responsibility legislation, "clever misdirection." This is a sham diverting attention from corporate polluters. Correct.

C

An important step in sensitising producers. It did the reverse, it shielded producers and shifted responsibility onto the public. Incorrect.

D

An innovative CSR initiative. The author views it cynically as corporate misdirection, not as praiseworthy social responsibility. Incorrect.

Option B is correct: the author treats Keep America Beautiful as a sham, a corporate greenwashing front that diverted attention away from corporate polluters and onto consumer behaviour.

Related Mixed Practice questions

See all Reading Comprehension questions →
CAT 2018 Slot 1 VARC Q15: It can be inferred that the author considers the Keep America Beautiful organisation: — Solution | TheCATExam