CAT 2020 Slot 3 — VARC Question 22
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:
1. It advocated a conservative approach to antitrust enforcement that espouses faith in efficient markets and voiced suspicion regarding the merits of judicial intervention to correct anticompetitive practices.
2. Many industries have consistently gained market share, the lion’s share – without any official concern; the most successful technology companies have grown into veritable titans, on the premise that they advance ‘public interest’.
3. That the new anticompetitive risks posed by tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, necessitate new legal solutions could be attributed to the dearth of enforcement actions against monopolies and the few cases challenging mergers in the USA.
4. The criterion of ‘consumer welfare standard’ and the principle that antitrust law should serve consumer interests and that it should protect competition rather than individual competitors was an antitrust law introduced by, and named after, the 'Chicago school'.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: 4123
Answer: 4123
Easy
Locate the sentence that defines a term the others merely refer to, then chase the pronouns. The pronoun “It” opening sentence 1 must attach to a noun already introduced.
Opener (4). Sentence 4 introduces and defines the “consumer welfare standard” — an antitrust law “introduced by, and named after, the ‘Chicago school’.” It supplies the term everything else depends on, so it opens.
Pair 4–1. Sentence 1 begins “It advocated a conservative approach to antitrust enforcement…” The pronoun “It” refers to the consumer-welfare standard / Chicago school of 4. This gives the mandatory pair 4–1.
Then 2. The conservative, hands-off approach of 1 produces the result in 2: “Many industries have consistently gained market share… without any official concern; the most successful technology companies have grown into veritable titans.” Cause (1) → effect (2).
Closer (3). Sentence 3 draws the conclusion — the “new anticompetitive risks posed by tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon” flow from “the dearth of enforcement actions.” It names the very titans of 2 and calls for new solutions, so it ends the paragraph: 4–1–2–3.
The coherent order is 4123.
Related Mixed Practice questions
- The author is least likely to agree with the view that the increase in screen-ti…
- The author claims that Silicon Valley tech companies have tried to “confus…
- The statement “The richer you are, the more you spend to be off-screen&rdq…
- Which of the following statements about the negative effects of screen time is t…
- Which one of the following best captures the main argument of the last paragraph…
- Which one of the following, if true, would be an accurate inference from the fir…