CAT 2024 Slot 3 — VARC Question 9
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
Moutai has been the global booze sensation of the decade. A bottle of its Flying Fairy which sold in the 1980s for the equivalent of a dollar now retails for $400. Moutai’s listed shares have soared by almost 600% in the past five years, outpacing the likes of Amazon. . . .
It does this while disregarding every Western marketing mantra. It is not global, has meagre digital sales and does not appeal to millennials. It scores pitifully on environmental, social and governance measures. In the Boy Scout world of Western business it would leave a bad taste, in more ways than one.
Moutai owes its intoxicating success to three factors—not all of them easy to emulate. First, it profits from Chinese nationalism. Moutai is known as the “national liquor”. It was used to raise spirits and disinfect wounds in Mao’s Long March. It was Premier Zhou Enlai’s favourite tipple, shared with Richard Nixon in 1972. Its centuries-old craftsmanship—it is distilled eight times and stored for years in earthenware jars—is a source of national pride. It also claims to be hangover-proof, which would make it an invention to rival gunpowder....
Second, it chose to serve China’s super-rich rather than its middle class. Markets are littered with the corpses of firms that could not compete in the cut-throat battle for Chinese middleclass wallets. And the country’s premium market is massive—at 73m-strong, bigger than the population of France, notes Euan McLeish of Bernstein, an investment firm, and still less crowded with prestige brands than advanced economies. Moutai is to these well-heeled drinkers what vintage champagne is to the rest of the world.....
Third, Moutai looks beyond affluent millennials and digital natives. The elderly and the middleaged, it found, can be just as lucrative. Its biggest market now is (male) drinkers in their mid30s. Many have no siblings, thanks to four decades of China’s one-child policy—which also means their elderly parents can splash out on weddings and banquets. Moutai is often a guest of honour.
Moutai has succeeded thanks to nationalism, elitism and ageism, in other words—not in spite of this unholy trinity. But it faces risks. The government is its largest shareholder—and a meddlesome one. It appears to want prices to remain stable. Exorbitantly priced booze is at odds with its professed socialist ideals. Yet minority investors—including many foreign funds —lament that Moutai’s wholesale price is a third of what it sells for in shops. Raising it could boost the company’s profits further. Instead, in what some see as a travesty of corporate governance, its majority owner has plans to set up its own sales channel.....
In the long run, its biggest risk may be millennials. As they grow older, health concerns, worklife balance and the desire for more wholesome pursuits than binge-drinking may curb the “Ganbei!” toasting culture [heavy drinking] on which so much of the demand for Moutai rests. For the time being, though, the party goes on.
Which one of the following is both a reason for Moutai’s success as well as a possible threat to that success?
Answer & solution
Its appeal to the older age group.
- B
Chinese love of liquor filled celebration.
- C
Its appeal to the rich.
- D
Government involvement in its business.
Medium
Find a single factor the passage names as both a driver of Moutai's success and a future risk. Moutai's success rests on nationalism, elitism and ageism; its stated risks are the meddlesome government shareholder and, "in the long run," millennials growing older and abandoning heavy-drinking culture.
Why right. "Its appeal to the older age group." Moutai succeeds partly through "ageism" — targeting mid-30s and older drinkers rather than millennials (success). But the long-run risk is precisely that these "millennials ... as they grow older" may abandon the "Ganbei!" toasting culture — i.e., the age-based demand that fuels Moutai is also the demographic threat. Same factor, both sides.
Why wrong. Liquor-filled celebration supports demand (success) but the passage doesn't cast "love of celebration" itself as a threat — the threat is the future decline of heavy-drinking culture, captured better by the age factor.
Why wrong. Appeal to the rich (elitism) is a success factor, but the passage does not present serving the super-rich as a threat.
Why wrong. Government involvement is named as a risk (a "meddlesome" shareholder keeping prices down) but is not credited as a reason for Moutai's success — so it fails the "both" requirement.
Correct answer: Option A.