CAT 2017 Slot 2 — VARC Question 4
Answer the following questions based on the information given below.
Creativity is at once our most precious resource and our most inexhaustible one. As anyone who has ever spent any time with children knows , every single human being is born creative ; every human being is innately endowed with the ability to combine and recombine date, perception , materials and ideas, and devise new way of thinking and doing. What fosters creativity? More than anything else: the presence of other creative people. The big myth is that creativity is the province of great individual geniuses. In fact creativity is a social process. Our biggest creative breakthroughs come when people learn from, compete with, and collaborate with other people.
Cities are the true fonts of creativity… With their diverse populations, dense social networks, and public spaces where people can meet spontaneously and serendipitously, they spark and catalyzed new ideas. With their infrastructure for finance, organization and trade, they allow those ideas to be swiftly actualized.
As for what staunches creativity, that’s easy, if ironic. it’s the very institutions that we build to manage, exploit and perpetuate the fruits of creativity -our big bureaucracies, and sad to say, too many of our schools. Creativity is disruptive; schools and organizations are regimented, standardized and stultifying.
The education expert Sir Ken Robinson points to a 1968 study reporting on a group of 1,600 children who were tested over time for their ability to think in out- of- the- box- ways. When the children were between 3 and 5 years old, 98 percent achieved positive scores. When they were 8 to 10, only 32 percent passed the same test, and only 10 percent at 13 to 15. When 280,000 25-year-olds took the test, just 2 percent passed. By the time we are adults, our creativity has been wrung out of us.
I once asked the great urbanist Jane Jacobs what makes some places more creative than others. She said, essentially, that the question was an easy one. All cities, she said ,were filled with creative people; that’s our default state as people. But some cities had more than their shares of leaders, people and institutions that blocked out that creativity. She called them “squelchers.”
Creativity (or the lack of it) follows the same general contours of the great socio-economic divide-our rising inequality-that plagues us. According to my own estimates, roughly a third of us across the United state, and perhaps as much as half of us in our most creative cities-are able to do work which engages our creative faculties to some extent whether as artist, musician, writers techies, innovators, entrepreneurs, doctors, lawyers, journalists, or educators, -those of us who work with our minds. That leaves a group that I term “the other 66 percent,” who toil in low -wage rote and rotten jobs-if they have jobs at all-in which their creativity is subjugated, ignored or wasted.
Creativity itself is not in danger. It’s flourishing is all around us -in science and technology, arts and culture, in our rapidly revitalizing cities. But we still have a long way to go if we want to build a truly creative society that supports and rewards the creativity of each and every one of us.
Jane Jacobs believed that cities that are more creative.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: have leaders and institutions that do not block creativity
- A
have to struggle to retain their creativity.
- B
have to ‘squelch’ unproductive people and promote creative ones.
have leaders and institutions that do not block creativity
- D
typically do not start off as creative hubs.
Easy
Confine yourself to paragraph 5, where Jane Jacobs speaks. Her claim has two parts: all cities are full of creative people by default, but some cities have more "squelchers" — leaders and institutions that block creativity. The right option must follow logically from this.
"have to struggle to retain their creativity." Jacobs never frames more-creative cities as struggling to retain creativity; her point is about the absence of squelchers, not a struggle. Eliminate.
"have to 'squelch' unproductive people and promote creative ones." This inverts her meaning. "Squelchers" are the villains who block creativity; she does not recommend squelching anyone. Eliminate.
"have leaders and institutions that do not block creativity." Since every city is full of creative people by default, what distinguishes the more-creative ones is simply having fewer squelchers — i.e., leaders and institutions that do not block creativity. This is the direct logical reading of paragraph 5. Correct.
"typically do not start off as creative hubs." The passage says nothing about how creative cities begin or their starting point. Unsupported. Eliminate.
Option C is the answer. For Jacobs, the creative cities are simply those with fewer "squelchers" — leaders and institutions that do not block the creativity everyone already has.
Related Mixed Practice questions
- In the author’s view, cities promote human creativity for all the followin…
- The author uses ‘ironic’ in the third paragraph to point out that…
- The central idea of this passage is that…
- The 1968 study is used here to show that…
- The author’s conclusions about the most ‘creative cities ‘in t…
- The purpose of this passage is to…