CAT 2017 Slot 2 — VARC Question 5
Answer the following questions based on the information given below.
Creativity is at once our most precious resource and our most inexhaustible one. As anyone who has ever spent any time with children knows , every single human being is born creative ; every human being is innately endowed with the ability to combine and recombine date, perception , materials and ideas, and devise new way of thinking and doing. What fosters creativity? More than anything else: the presence of other creative people. The big myth is that creativity is the province of great individual geniuses. In fact creativity is a social process. Our biggest creative breakthroughs come when people learn from, compete with, and collaborate with other people.
Cities are the true fonts of creativity… With their diverse populations, dense social networks, and public spaces where people can meet spontaneously and serendipitously, they spark and catalyzed new ideas. With their infrastructure for finance, organization and trade, they allow those ideas to be swiftly actualized.
As for what staunches creativity, that’s easy, if ironic. it’s the very institutions that we build to manage, exploit and perpetuate the fruits of creativity -our big bureaucracies, and sad to say, too many of our schools. Creativity is disruptive; schools and organizations are regimented, standardized and stultifying.
The education expert Sir Ken Robinson points to a 1968 study reporting on a group of 1,600 children who were tested over time for their ability to think in out- of- the- box- ways. When the children were between 3 and 5 years old, 98 percent achieved positive scores. When they were 8 to 10, only 32 percent passed the same test, and only 10 percent at 13 to 15. When 280,000 25-year-olds took the test, just 2 percent passed. By the time we are adults, our creativity has been wrung out of us.
I once asked the great urbanist Jane Jacobs what makes some places more creative than others. She said, essentially, that the question was an easy one. All cities, she said ,were filled with creative people; that’s our default state as people. But some cities had more than their shares of leaders, people and institutions that blocked out that creativity. She called them “squelchers.”
Creativity (or the lack of it) follows the same general contours of the great socio-economic divide-our rising inequality-that plagues us. According to my own estimates, roughly a third of us across the United state, and perhaps as much as half of us in our most creative cities-are able to do work which engages our creative faculties to some extent whether as artist, musician, writers techies, innovators, entrepreneurs, doctors, lawyers, journalists, or educators, -those of us who work with our minds. That leaves a group that I term “the other 66 percent,” who toil in low -wage rote and rotten jobs-if they have jobs at all-in which their creativity is subjugated, ignored or wasted.
Creativity itself is not in danger. It’s flourishing is all around us -in science and technology, arts and culture, in our rapidly revitalizing cities. But we still have a long way to go if we want to build a truly creative society that supports and rewards the creativity of each and every one of us.
The 1968 study is used here to show that
Answer & solution
Correct answer: schooling today does not encourage creative thinking in children.
- A
as they get older, children usally learn to be more creative.
schooling today does not encourage creative thinking in children.
- C
the more children learn, the less creative they become.
- D
technology today prevents children from being creative.
Easy
Ask what point the 1968 study is recruited to prove. It appears in paragraph 4, right after paragraph 3 names schools as stiflers of creativity. So the study is evidence for that claim — read the falling scores in context, not as a standalone fact.
"as they get older, children usually learn to be more creative." The scores fall from 98% to 2% with age — the opposite of becoming more creative. Contradicted. Eliminate.
"schooling today does not encourage creative thinking in children." The study sits directly after the claim that "too many of our schools" staunch creativity because they are "regimented, standardized and stultifying." The declining scores as children move through schooling illustrate exactly this. Correct.
"the more children learn, the less creative they become." A tempting trap, but the author blames schooling/institutions, not learning itself — indeed creativity is described as learning "from, compete with, and collaborate with" others. It is the regimented system, not knowledge, that wrings creativity out. Eliminate.
"technology today prevents children from being creative." Technology is nowhere a variable in this study. Out of scope. Eliminate.
Option B is the answer. The plummeting test scores are offered as evidence that schooling, being regimented and standardized, does not encourage creative thinking.
Related Mixed Practice questions
- In the author’s view, cities promote human creativity for all the followin…
- The author uses ‘ironic’ in the third paragraph to point out that…
- The central idea of this passage is that…
- Jane Jacobs believed that cities that are more creative.…
- The author’s conclusions about the most ‘creative cities ‘in t…
- The purpose of this passage is to…